.png)
On the surface, Chairman Zhu Lilun interpreted the four referendums as a case of overthrowing the Soviet cabinet. In his bones, the four referendums were even more implicitly the Kuomintang's counterattack against the label of "anti-China protection of Taiwan", hoping to reverse Taiwan's pro-American and anti-China political pattern. At this time, the DPP wants to dismantle the bombs of the four referendums at the end of the year. It should not reflexively return to the simplified label of "anti-China Taiwan", but should deeply understand that the four referendums are actually emotional mobilization of voters. Rationally analyze the structure of "voters who have
and break them down individually. It is not the blue and white supporters who will be dissatisfied with the government. Overemphasizing "anti-China Taiwan" will only have the opposite effect To put it simply, voters who want to "match the government with their middle finger" are not necessarily core supporters of the Kuomintang (or the People's Party). In sms services a democratic society, suspicion and distrust of the government is a natural, even healthy attitude most of the time. Therefore, no matter which party is in power, there will be a certain percentage of the public who feel that "the government should not be too trusting", or even that "standing
On the opposite side of the government, it should be a way of monitoring the government.” The outbreak of the epidemic in Taiwan since May has greatly increased the above-mentioned distrust of the government. Especially during the period of vaccine shortage, there is disagreement on non-manageriality. The people's emotionally urgent expectations for vaccines are real and real. Emotional reactions, such emotional ups and downs, also provided favorable soil for the Kuomintang to operate the four referendum cases. These voters, who are inherently skeptical of the government and tend to stand against the government, may decide the success or failure of the referendum. In